But there is one aspect that is often ignored when searching for how to refine the literary art. Plot.
Perhaps it's the idea that cramming some written work into a pre-described model is somehow un-artistic. Perhaps the types of people who gravitate toward English degrees tend to read differently. Perhaps it's that plot is one of the more basic aspects of story. Perhaps we're just reacting to the importance that Aristotle put on plot. I don't know.
But when I read someone's work who has studied writing in college, I am inevitably impressed by their ability to craft words into something beautiful. And almost as inevitably I don't see a plot.
Now don't get me wrong. Not all writing needs a plot. And sometimes we get more from a story if there are certain plot elements that are purposely twisted or ignored. But there seems to be something against good solid plot.
Here's my ideas on plot. If you're a writer, and you are interested in selling a book there is one element that saves poor writing, poor character development, and even poor dialogue. It's plot.
Plot, more than setting or character, is the element we have a primal reaction to. If part of the plot is missing, we fill it in subconsciously. If the plot is in the wrong order, we fix it in our minds. It's the basic story of the thing, the scaffolding that holds a narrative up.
When writing it is pretty easy to go back in and add a line to fix a character, or even add in a whole new character. It's not even that hard to completely overhaul the setting.
But to change the plot in any major way you might as well write a new book. The story is the plot.
If you want to write beautiful words that don't need a plot, write a poem (although some poetry uses plot as well). Poetry is great.
But if you want to sell a novel, learn how to plot. Study how plots work, there are plenty of models. If you have a solid plot, then your story will make sense. Plot may not be the deepest aspect of story, but if you don't have it right then people will notice.
I like plot. It's probably one of my favorite things in a novel because I like to predict the outcome of the story, which you can usually do if you're watching the plot. But I don't agree with you that it's what people have a "primal reaction" to. Without character or setting, plot is nothing more than "man vs. nature." And I don't get a primal reaction to that at all.
ReplyDeleteWithout good characters, plot won't save a story. I don't think I've ever suffered through a story with a "great plot but crappy everything else" twice. You even said yourself that plot isn't always necessary. If plot were the cause of the 'primal reaction' then it WOULD always be necessary.
I think plot has its strengths. It allows the reader to get excited for and anticipate events to come. But unless there's a good character to care about, there's not going to be any anticipation because the reader isn't going to care what happens. It's the difference between a synopsis and the actual story.
Just my thoughts.
I was a bit too strong on my "PLOT IS KING!" kick. Thanks for calling me out.
ReplyDelete